| Title |
Maternal Sensitivity and Internalizing Problems: Evidence from Two Longitudinal Studies in Early Childhood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10578-013-0369-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rianne Kok, Mariëlle Linting, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Albert Hofman, Frank C. Verhulst, Henning Tiemeier |
| Abstract |
The goal of this study is to clarify the relation between maternal sensitivity and internalizing problems during the preschool period. For this purpose, a longitudinal, bidirectional model was tested in two large prospective, population-based cohorts, the Generation R Study and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (NICHD SECCYD), including over 1,800 mother-child dyads in total. Maternal sensitivity was repeatedly observed in mother-child interaction tasks and information on child internalizing problems was obtained from maternal reports. Modest but consistent associations between maternal sensitivity and internalizing problems were found in both cohorts, confirming the importance of sensitive parenting for positive development in the preschool years. Pathways from maternal sensitivity to child internalizing problems were consistently observed but child-to-mother pathways were only found in the NICHD SECCYD sample. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 67 | 47% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,349,805
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#699
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,791
of 287,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.