↓ Skip to main content

Visualization of tumor heterogeneity by in situ padlock probe technology in colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Visualization of tumor heterogeneity by in situ padlock probe technology in colorectal cancer
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00418-017-1557-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amin El-Heliebi, Karl Kashofer, Julia Fuchs, Stephan W. Jahn, Christian Viertler, Andrija Matak, Peter Sedlmayr, Gerald Hoefler

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity is considered a major cause for therapy resistance in colorectal cancer. Sub-populations of cells with different genetic alterations may exist in spatially distinct areas. Upon therapy, resistant sub-clones may enrich and ultimately lead to disease progression. Although ample data are available on tumors which are heterogeneous on a morphological level, only little is known about morphologically homogeneous tumors. We aimed to investigate if morphologically homogeneous colorectal cancer can harbor a heterogeneous genetic landscape. We chose to microdissect six morphologically homogeneous colorectal carcinomas into several areas and performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify tumors with genetic heterogeneity. We then applied an mRNA-based in situ mutation detection technology based on padlock probes to localize and visualize mutations directly in the tumor tissue. In three out of six tumors, NGS revealed a high rate of variability of mutations between different tumor areas. We selected two cases for in situ mutation detection to visualize genetic heterogeneity. In situ mutation detection confirmed differences in mutant allele frequencies between different tumor areas of morphological homogeneous tumors. We conclude that genetic heterogeneity in morphologically homogeneous colorectal cancer is an observable, but underreported event. Our results illustrate the power of in situ mutation analysis to visualize genetic heterogeneity directly in tumor tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,280,449
of 25,223,158 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#233
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,327
of 315,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,223,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.