↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for combining Twitter users geo-location methods

Overview of attention for article published in GeoInformatica, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for combining Twitter users geo-location methods
Published in
GeoInformatica, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10707-017-0296-z
Authors

Silvio Ribeiro, Gisele L. Pappa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 38%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,539,663
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from GeoInformatica
#90
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,107
of 308,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoInformatica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.