You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A tale of two specificities: bispecific antibodies for therapeutic and diagnostic applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Biotechnology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.08.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Byrne, Paul J. Conroy, James C. Whisstock, Richard J. O’Kennedy |
| Abstract |
Artificial manipulation of antibody genes has facilitated the production of several unique recombinant antibody formats, which have highly important therapeutic and biotechnological applications. Although bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are not new, they are coming to the forefront as our knowledge of the potential efficacy of antibody-based therapeutics expands. The next generation of bsAbs is developing due to significant improvements in recombinant antibody technologies. This review focuses on recent advances with a particular focus on improvements in format and design that are contributing to the resurgence of bsAbs, and in particular, on innovative structures applicable to next generation point-of-care (POC) devices with applicability to low resource environments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 314 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 80 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 13% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 66 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 21 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,760,001
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#979
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,036
of 220,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.