You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bedside Back to Bench: Building Bridges between Basic and Clinical Genomic Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teri A. Manolio, Douglas M. Fowler, Lea M. Starita, Melissa A. Haendel, Daniel G. MacArthur, Leslie G. Biesecker, Elizabeth Worthey, Rex L. Chisholm, Eric D. Green, Howard J. Jacob, Howard L. McLeod, Dan Roden, Laura Lyman Rodriguez, Marc S. Williams, Gregory M. Cooper, Nancy J. Cox, Gail E. Herman, Stephen Kingsmore, Cecilia Lo, Cathleen Lutz, Calum A. MacRae, Robert L. Nussbaum, Jose M. Ordovas, Erin M. Ramos, Peter N. Robinson, Wendy S. Rubinstein, Christine Seidman, Barbara E. Stranger, Haoyi Wang, Monte Westerfield, Carol Bult |
| Abstract |
Genome sequencing has revolutionized the diagnosis of genetic diseases. Close collaborations between basic scientists and clinical genomicists are now needed to link genetic variants with disease causation. To facilitate such collaborations, we recommend prioritizing clinically relevant genes for functional studies, developing reference variant-phenotype databases, adopting phenotype description standards, and promoting data sharing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 47% |
| Scientists | 27 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 21% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 49 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#561,797
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#2,684
of 17,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,852
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#58
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.