| Title |
Effect of a Systems Intervention on the Quality and Safety of Patient Handoffs in an Internal Medicine Residency Program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2391-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly L. Graham, Edward R. Marcantonio, Grace C. Huang, Julius Yang, Roger B. Davis, C. Christopher Smith |
| Abstract |
Poor quality handoffs have been identified as a major patient safety issue. In residency programs, problematic handoffs may be an unintended consequence of duty-hour restrictions, and key data are frequently omitted from written handoffs because of the lack of standardization of content. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 63% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 26% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,250,972
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,343
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,316
of 200,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#27
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.