↓ Skip to main content

Reverse Locked-In Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Reverse Locked-In Syndrome
Published in
Neurocritical Care, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12028-017-0391-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pooja Raibagkar, Ram V. Chavali, Tamara B. Kaplan, Jennifer A. Kim, Meaghan V. Nitka, Sherry H.-Y. Chou, Brian L. Edlow

Abstract

Basilar artery occlusion can cause locked-in syndrome, which is characterized by quadriplegia, anarthria, and limited communication via eye movements. Here, we describe an uncommon stroke syndrome associated with endovascular recanalization of the top of the basilar artery: "reverse locked-in syndrome." We report the case of a patient with atypical neurological deficits caused by acute ischemic stroke of the midbrain tegmentum. We perform neuroanatomic localization of the patient's infarcts by mapping the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data onto a brainstem atlas. A 61-year-old man presented with acute coma and quadriplegia due to top of the basilar artery occlusion. He underwent emergent endovascular thrombectomy, with successful recanalization of the basilar artery at 4 h and 43 min post-ictus. The patient regained consciousness and purposeful movement in all four extremities, but the post-procedure neurological examination demonstrated bilateral ptosis with complete pupillary and oculomotor paralysis. MRI revealed infarction of the bilateral oculomotor nuclei in the midbrain tegmentum. At 9-month follow-up, he had anisocoria and dysconjugate gaze, but was living at home and required minimal assistance in performing all activities of daily living. Since the patient's deficits were the exact opposite of those described in locked-in syndrome, we propose the term "reverse locked-in syndrome" to describe this neurological entity characterized by bilateral ptosis, non-reactive pupils, and ophthalmoplegia with preservation of consciousness and extremity motor function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Researcher 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Neuroscience 6 12%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,168,008
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#1,255
of 1,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,396
of 310,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.