| Title |
Rates and Probable Causes of Freshwater Tidal Marsh Failure, Potomac River Estuary, Northern Virginia, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wetlands, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13157-013-0461-6 |
| Authors |
Ronald J. Litwin, Joseph P. Smoot, Milan J. Pavich, Erik Oberg, Brent Steury, Ben Helwig, Helaine W. Markewich, Vincent L. Santucci, Geoffrey Sanders |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2013.
All research outputs
#5,850,959
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#151
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,650
of 207,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.