↓ Skip to main content

Hospital mortality prognostication in sepsis using the new biomarkers suPAR and proADM in a single determination on ICU admission

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
12 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Hospital mortality prognostication in sepsis using the new biomarkers suPAR and proADM in a single determination on ICU admission
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-3056-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Suberviola, A. Castellanos-Ortega, A. Ruiz Ruiz, M. Lopez-Hoyos, M. Santibañez

Abstract

The soluble form of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and proadrenomedullin (proADM) are two new and promising sepsis biomarkers. We assessed the prognostic value of a single determination of proADM and suPAR, comparing them with C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), and evaluating whether their addition to severity scores (APACHE II and SOFA) could improve their prognostic accuracy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 107 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 31 28%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 63%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,636,290
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,326
of 5,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,311
of 176,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.