You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Managing and learning with multiple models: Objectives and optimization algorithms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.031 |
| Authors |
William J.M. Probert, Cindy E. Hauser, Eve McDonald-Madden, Michael C. Runge, Peter W.J. Baxter, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Sweden | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 119 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 33% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#5,716
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,337
of 120,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#42
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.