| Title |
Magnetic resonance imaging of a randomized controlled trial investigating predictors of recovery following psychological treatment in adolescents with moderate to severe unipolar depression: study protocol for Magnetic Resonance-Improving Mood with Psychoanalytic and Cognitive Therapies (MR-IMPACT)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-247 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cindy C Hagan, Julia ME Graham, Barry Widmer, Rosemary J Holt, Cinly Ooi, Adrienne O van Nieuwenhuizen, Peter Fonagy, Shirley Reynolds, Mary Target, Raphael Kelvin, Paul O Wilkinson, Edward T Bullmore, Belinda R Lennox, Barbara J Sahakian, Ian Goodyer, John Suckling |
| Abstract |
Major depressive disorders (MDD) are a debilitating and pervasive group of mental illnesses afflicting many millions of people resulting in the loss of 110 million working days and more than 2,500 suicides per annum. Adolescent MDD patients attending NHS clinics show high rates of recurrence into adult life. A meta-analysis of recent research shows that psychological treatments are not as efficacious as previously thought. Modest treatment outcomes of approximately 65% of cases responding suggest that aetiological and clinical heterogeneity may hamper the better use of existing therapies and discovery of more effective treatments. Information with respect to optimal treatment choice for individuals is lacking, with no validated biomarkers to aid therapeutic decision-making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 75 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2013.
All research outputs
#19,529,371
of 24,024,220 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,190
of 5,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,515
of 212,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#75
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,024,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.