↓ Skip to main content

Can body composition be used to optimize the dose of platinum chemotherapy in lung cancer? A feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Can body composition be used to optimize the dose of platinum chemotherapy in lung cancer? A feasibility study
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00520-016-3518-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Crosby, Catherine D’Souza, Carina Bristow, Amy Proffitt, Asmah Hussain, Vanessa Potter, Ivo Hennig, Richard O’Connor, Vickie Baracos, Andrew Wilcock

Abstract

Current methods of dosing platinum-based chemotherapy are suboptimal. Potentially, taking lean body mass into account may help. To inform the design of a future study, we first examined the feasibility and acceptability of such an approach using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and explored aspects suggestive of over- and under-dosing. Patients with lung cancer offered platinum-based chemotherapy over 1 year were identified and, if eligible, invited to take part in a prospective feasibility study. Questionnaires examined acceptability of the DEXA scan and of a future study that randomized between traditional dosing and one adjusted according to body composition. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and a lack of neutropenia explored potential over- and under-dosing, respectively. Of the 173 patients offered chemotherapy, 123 (71%) were ineligible, mostly because of failing entry criteria (84, 49%). Of the 50 approached, 18 (36%) participated, most receiving carboplatin, with 17 providing data. All found a DEXA scan acceptable; other assessments were fully completed, except nadir and pre-chemotherapy blood counts. Most (94%) were prepared to take part in a future study, although the additional hospital visits for a nadir blood count were unpopular with some. Five (29%) patients experienced six episodes of DLT which resulted in discontinuation (3), dose reduction (2) or change to a less toxic regimen (1). Nine (60%) patients experienced either no (2) or inconsistent (7) neutropenia. A randomized trial appears acceptable and feasible in patients receiving carboplatin. Adjustment of our entry criteria and avoiding a hospital visit for a nadir blood count should aid recruitment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 45%
Computer Science 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,451,618
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,142
of 4,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,766
of 420,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#60
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.