↓ Skip to main content

Left ventricular function in response to dipyridamole stress: head-to-head comparison between 82Rubidium PET and 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT ECG-gated myocardial perfusion imaging

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Left ventricular function in response to dipyridamole stress: head-to-head comparison between 82Rubidium PET and 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT ECG-gated myocardial perfusion imaging
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00259-016-3588-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Clementina Giorgi, Jose Claudio Meneghetti, Jose Soares, Marisa Izaki, Andréa Falcão, Rodrigo Imada, William Chalela, Marco Antonio de Oliveira, Cesar Nomura, Hein J. Verberne

Abstract

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with (99m)Tc-sestamibi (sestamibi) SPECT and rubidium-82 ((82)Rb) PET both allow for combined assessment of perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function. We sought to compare parameters of LV function obtained with both methods using a single dipyridamole stress dose. A group of 221 consecutive patients (65.2 ± 10.4 years, 52.9% male) underwent consecutive sestamibi and (82)Rb MPI after a single dipyridamole stress dose. Sestamibi and (82)Rb summed rest (SRS), stress (SSS) and difference (SDS) scores, and LV end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared. Bland-Altman analysis showed that with increasing ESV and EDV the difference between the two perfusion tracers increased both at rest and post-stress. The mean difference in EDV and ESV between the two perfusion tracers at rest could both be independently explained by the (82)Rb SDS and the sestamibi SRS. The combined models explained approximately 30% of the variation in these volumes between the two perfusion tracers (R(2) = 0.261, p = 0.005; R(2) = 0.296, p < 0.001, for EDV and ESV respectively). However, the mean difference in LVEF between sestamibi and (82)Rb showed no significant trend post-stress (R(2) = 0.001, p = 0.70) and only a modest linear increase with increasing LVEF values at rest (R(2) = 0.032, p = 0.009). Differences in left ventricular volumes between sestamibi and (82)Rb MPI increase with increasing volumes. However, these differences did only marginally affect LVEF between sestamibi and (82)Rb. In clinical practice these results should be taken into account when comparing functional derived parameters between sestamibi and (82)Rb MPI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 4 27%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#19,214,418
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2,305
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,911
of 425,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#20
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.