| Title |
Distribution, ecology, and status of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, in the Mediterranean Sea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-017-9470-5 |
| Authors |
G. Boldrocchi, J. Kiszka, S. Purkis, T. Storai, L. Zinzula, D. Burkholder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 11% |
| Spain | 7 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Greece | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 69% |
| Scientists | 30 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 95 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#502,298
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#11
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,327
of 323,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them