| Title |
High success rates of sedation-free brain MRI scanning in young children using simple subject preparation protocols with and without a commercial mock scanner–the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Radiology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00247-013-2798-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naama Barnea-Goraly, Stuart A. Weinzimer, Katrina J. Ruedy, Nelly Mauras, Roy W. Beck, Matt J. Marzelli, Paul K. Mazaika, Tandy Aye, Neil H. White, Eva Tsalikian, Larry Fox, Craig Kollman, Peiyao Cheng, Allan L. Reiss, on behalf of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) |
| Abstract |
The ability to lie still in an MRI scanner is essential for obtaining usable image data. To reduce motion, young children are often sedated, adding significant cost and risk. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 28% |
| Psychology | 13 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,699,064
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#1,481
of 2,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,150
of 208,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.