↓ Skip to main content

The effect of a taurine-containing drink on performance in 10 endurance-athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, February 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
The effect of a taurine-containing drink on performance in 10 endurance-athletes
Published in
Amino Acids, February 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00808445
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. -R. Geiß, I. Jester, W. Falke, M. Hamm, K. -L. Waag

Abstract

To determine the effect of a taurine-enriched drink "Red Bull" on performance, 10 endurance-athletes performed three trials. After 60 min. cycling at approximately 70% VO2 max, the subjects pedalled to exhaustion on a cycle ergometer. During each exercise, the subjects received 500 ml of a test-drink after 30 min. submaximal cycling: "Red Bull" without taurine, without glucuronolacton (U1), "Red Bull" without taurine, without glucuronolacton, without caffeine (U2) and "Red Bull" original drink containing taurine, glucuronolacton and caffeine (U3).The heart rate level was significantly lower in U3 (p = 0,0031) 15 min. after application. The plasma catecholamines increased slightly from begin of exercise to 15 min. after application of the drinks in all trials but remained on a significantly lower level in U3 (epinephrine (p = 0,0011) and norepinephrine (p = 0,0003). Endurance time was significantly longer with "Red Bull" original in U3 (p = 0,015). The results of this study show a positive effect of a taurine-containing drink on hormonal responses which leads to a higher performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 27%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 17 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,369,647
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#259
of 1,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,897
of 72,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them