Title |
A comparison of US and Australian men’s values and preferences for PSA screening
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-388 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kirsten Howard, Alison T Brenner, Carmen Lewis, Stacey Sheridan, Trisha Crutchfield, Sarah Hawley, Matthew E Nielsen, Michael P Pignone |
Abstract |
Patient preferences derived from an assessment of values can help inform the design of screening programs, but how best to do so, and whether such preferences differ cross-nationally, has not been well-examined. The objective of this study was to compare the values and preferences of Australian and US men for PSA (prostate specific antigen) screening. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 27% |
Researcher | 7 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
Psychology | 7 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,281,593
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,541
of 7,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,973
of 207,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#92
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.