↓ Skip to main content

Deep phenotyping of the unselected COPSAC2010 birth cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Allergy, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep phenotyping of the unselected COPSAC2010 birth cohort study
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/cea.12213
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Bisgaard, N. H. Vissing, C. G. Carson, A. L. Bischoff, N. V. Følsgaard, E. Kreiner‐Møller, B. L. K. Chawes, J. Stokholm, L. Pedersen, E. Bjarnadóttir, A. H. Thysen, E. Nilsson, L. J. Mortensen, S. F. Olsen, S. Schjørring, K. A. Krogfelt, L. Lauritzen, S. Brix, K. Bønnelykke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 268 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 16%
Student > Master 35 13%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 74 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 4%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 83 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,700,145
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#827
of 3,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,047
of 320,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#16
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.