| Title |
A review of detection range testing in aquatic passive acoustic telemetry studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-013-9328-4 |
| Authors |
S. T. Kessel, S. J. Cooke, M. R. Heupel, N. E. Hussey, C. A. Simpfendorfer, S. Vagle, A. T. Fisk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 432 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 98 | 22% |
| Researcher | 79 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 11% |
| Unknown | 81 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 208 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 102 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 99 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,206,436
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#172
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,114
of 215,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.