↓ Skip to main content

Geochemical investigations of polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins in the subsurface environment at an abandoned wood‐treatment facility

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geochemical investigations of polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins in the subsurface environment at an abandoned wood‐treatment facility
Published in
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/etc.5620040507
Authors

Wilfred E. Pereira, Colleen E. Rostad, Mary E. Sisak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 4 67%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Materials Science 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 1998.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#1,595
of 5,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,132
of 107,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#281
of 993 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 993 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.