↓ Skip to main content

Medication Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Medication Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Older Adults
Published in
Drugs & Aging, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40266-013-0105-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan, Maciej Banach, Linda G. Jones, Ali Ahmed, Wilbert S. Aronow

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a common problem in older adults. Individuals aged 65 years or older are at a higher risk for developing HF, especially diastolic HF or HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HF can be seen in up to 20 % of adults aged 85 years or older. In contrast to middle-aged (40-64 years) HF patients, multiple cardiac, non-cardiac and geriatric syndrome co-morbidities are seen in elderly HF patients. Additionally, age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics influence medication therapy. Hence, the management of older patients with HF is challenging and treatment should be modified in the light of the above-mentioned conditions. This article discusses the current evidence for medication management in both systolic HF or HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF, noting, however, the limited data for HFpEF and HFrEF in those 80 years of age or older. The objective of this article is to discuss evidence-based and outcomes-driven pharmacologic management strategies for chronic HF in the older adults for whom functional and other patient-centered outcomes might be more than or as important as clinical outcomes. Optimal management would be expected to help to reduce illness burden, reduce mortality and hospitalizations, and improve function and quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 23%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#12,592,594
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#811
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,584
of 198,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.