↓ Skip to main content

Sperm competition drives the evolution of suicidal reproduction in mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
34 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sperm competition drives the evolution of suicidal reproduction in mammals
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1310691110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana O. Fisher, Christopher R. Dickman, Menna E. Jones, Simon P. Blomberg

Abstract

Suicidal reproduction (semelparity) has evolved in only four genera of mammals. In these insectivorous marsupials, all males die after mating, when failure of the corticosteroid feedback mechanism elevates stress hormone levels during the mating season and causes lethal immune system collapse (die-off). We quantitatively test and resolve the evolutionary causes of this surprising and extreme life history strategy. We show that as marsupial predators in Australia, South America, and Papua New Guinea diversified into higher latitudes, seasonal predictability in abundance of their arthropod prey increased in multiple habitats. More-predictable prey peaks were associated with shorter annual breeding seasons, consistent with the suggestion that females accrue fitness benefits by timing peak energy demands of reproduction to coincide with maximum food abundance. We demonstrate that short mating seasons intensified reproductive competition between males, increasing male energy investment in copulations and reducing male postmating survival. However, predictability of annual prey cycles alone does not explain suicidal reproduction, because unlike insect abundance, peak ovulation dates in semelparous species are often synchronized to the day among years, triggered by a species-specific rate of change of photoperiod. Among species with low postmating male survival, we show that those with suicidal reproduction have shorter mating seasons and larger testes relative to body size. This indicates that lethal effort is adaptive in males because females escalate sperm competition by further shortening and synchronizing the annual mating period and mating promiscuously. We conclude that precopulatory sexual selection by females favored the evolution of suicidal reproduction in mammals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Brazil 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 253 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 21%
Researcher 51 19%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Master 22 8%
Professor 17 6%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 41 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 57%
Environmental Science 22 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Neuroscience 4 1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 54 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 416. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#69,577
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,693
of 102,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#424
of 217,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16
of 909 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 909 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.