↓ Skip to main content

Biological basis for amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer’S disease

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Biological basis for amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer’S disease
Published in
Biochemistry, February 2017
DOI 10.1134/s0006297917020043
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. V. Andreeva, W. J. Lukiw, E. I. Rogaev

Abstract

Certain cellular proteins normally soluble in the living organism under certain conditions form aggregates with a specific cross-β sheet structure called amyloid. These intra- or extracellular insoluble aggregates (fibers or plaques) are hallmarks of many neurodegenerative pathologies including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, prion disease, and other progressive neurological diseases that develop in the aging human central nervous system. Amyloid diseases (amyloidoses) are widespread in the elderly human population, a rapidly expanding demographic in many global populations. Increasing age is the most significant risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases associated with amyloid plaques. To date, nearly three dozen different misfolded proteins targeting brain and other organs have been identified in amyloid diseases and AD, the most prevalent neurodegenerative amyloid disease affecting over 15 million people worldwide. Here we (i) highlight the latest data on mechanisms of amyloid formation and further discuss a hypothesis on the amyloid cascade as a primary mechanism of AD pathogenesis and (ii) review the evolutionary aspects of amyloidosis, which allow new insight on human-specific mechanisms of dementia development.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 27%
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 22%
Neuroscience 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,858,208
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#2,615
of 22,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,473
of 323,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#17
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,316 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.