| Title |
Interactions Between Pharmaceutical Representatives and Doctors in Training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0134.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniella A. Zipkin, Michael A. Steinman |
| Abstract |
Medical school and residency are formative years in establishing patterns of prescribing. We aimed to review the literature regarding the extent of pharmaceutical industry contact with trainees, attitudes about these interactions, and effects on trainee prescribing behavior, with an emphasis on points of potential intervention and policy formation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 29% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Romania | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 31% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,798,019
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,380
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,684
of 67,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#12
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.