↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Three Interventions on the Reading Skills of Children With Reading Disabilities in Grade 2

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Learning Disabilities, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Three Interventions on the Reading Skills of Children With Reading Disabilities in Grade 2
Published in
Journal of Learning Disabilities, March 2011
DOI 10.1177/0022219410391187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Gustafson, Linda Fälth, Idor Svensson, Tomas Tjus, Mikael Heimann

Abstract

In a longitudinal intervention study, the effects of three intervention strategies on the reading skills of children with reading disabilities in Grade 2 were analyzed. The interventions consisted of computerized training programs: One bottom-up intervention aimed at improving word decoding skills and phonological abilities, the second intervention focused on top-down processing on the word and sentence levels, and the third was a combination of these two training programs (n = 25 in each group). In addition, there were two comparison groups, 25 children with reading disabilities who received ordinary special instruction and 30 age-matched typical readers. All reading disabled participants completed 25 training sessions with special education teachers. All groups improved their reading skills. The group who received combined training showed higher improvements than the ordinary special instruction group and the typical readers. Different cognitive variables were related to treatment gains for different groups. Thus, a treatment combining bottom-up and top-down aspects of reading was the most effective in general, but individual differences among children need to be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Unknown 152 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 42 26%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 28%
Social Sciences 38 24%
Linguistics 8 5%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Arts and Humanities 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 38 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,289,860
of 25,282,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Learning Disabilities
#285
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,124
of 114,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Learning Disabilities
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,282,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.