You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are informal carers and community care workers effective in managing malnutrition in the older adult community? A systematic review of current evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-013-0341-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Skye Marshall, J. Bauer, S. Capra, Elizabeth Isenring |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,671,930
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#590
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,717
of 220,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.