Title |
Efficacy of Fasting and Calorie Restriction (FCR) on mood and depression among ageing men
|
---|---|
Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12603-013-0344-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
N.M. Hussin, S. Shahar, N.I.M.F. Teng, W.Z.W. Ngah, S.K. Das |
Abstract |
An intervention study on the FCR (Fasting and Calorie Restriction) dietary regime was carried out to determine its efficacy in improving mood states and depression status among ageing men. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 25 | 34% |
United States | 9 | 12% |
Spain | 8 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Djibouti | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 64 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
Scientists | 3 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 206 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 21% |
Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Other | 30 | 15% |
Unknown | 51 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
Psychology | 16 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
Other | 37 | 18% |
Unknown | 58 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#480,086
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#43
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,719
of 220,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.