| Title |
Promoting access to innovation for frail old persons IAGG (International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics), WHO (World Health Organization) and SFGG (Societe Francaise de Geriatrie et de Gerontologie) workshop — Athens January 20–21, 2012
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-013-0039-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Berrut, S. Andrieu, I. Araujo De Carvalho, J.P. Baeyens, H. Bergman, B. Cassim, F. Cerreta, M. Cesari, H.B. Cha, L.K. Chen, A. Cherubini, M.Y. Chou, A.J. Cruz-Jentoft, L. De Decker, P. Du, B. Forette, F. Forette, A. Franco, R. Guimaraes, L.M. Gutierrez-Robledo, J. Jauregui, V. Khavinson, W.J. Lee, L.N. Peng, C. Perret-Guillaume, M. Petrovic, F. Retornaz, K. Rockwood, L. Rodriguez-Manas, C. Sieber, G. Spatharakis, O. Theou, E. Topinkova, B. Vellas, Athanase Benetos |
| Abstract |
Frailty tends to be considered as a major risk for adverse outcomes in older persons, but some important aspects remain matter of debate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 26% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2017.
All research outputs
#16,839,069
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1,501
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,828
of 220,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.