↓ Skip to main content

MR imaging differentiation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ based on relaxation and magnetic susceptibility properties

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
MR imaging differentiation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ based on relaxation and magnetic susceptibility properties
Published in
Neuroradiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00234-017-1813-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olaf Dietrich, Johannes Levin, Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi, Annika Plate, Maximilian F. Reiser, Kai Bötzel, Armin Giese, Birgit Ertl-Wagner

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the MR imaging behavior of ferrous (Fe(2+)) and ferric (Fe(3+)) iron ions in order to develop a noninvasive technique to quantitatively differentiate between both forms of iron. MRI was performed at 3 T in a phantom consisting of 21 samples with different concentrations of ferrous and ferric chloride solutions (between 0 and 10 mmol/L). A multi-echo spoiled gradient-echo pulse sequence with eight echoes was used for both T 2* and quantitative susceptibility measurements. The transverse relaxation rate, R 2* = 1/T 2*, was determined by nonlinear exponential fitting based on the mean signals in each sample. The susceptibilities, χ, of the samples were calculated after phase unwrapping and background field removal by fitting the spatial convolution of a unit dipole response to the measured internal field map. Relaxation rate changes, ΔR 2*(c Fe), and susceptibility changes, Δχ(c Fe), their linear slopes, as well as the ratios ΔR 2*(c Fe) / Δχ(c Fe) were determined for all concentrations. The linear slopes of the relaxation rate were (12.5 ± 0.4) s(-1)/(mmol/L) for Fe(3+) and (0.77 ± 0.09) s(-1)/(mmol/L) for Fe(2+) (significantly different, z test P < 0.0001). The linear slopes of the susceptibility were (0.088 ± 0.003) ppm/(mmol/L) for Fe(3+) and (0.079 ± 0.006) ppm/(mmol/L) for Fe(2+). The individual ratios ΔR 2*/Δχ were greater than 40 s(-1)/ppm for all samples with ferric solution and lower than 20 s(-1)/ppm for all but one of the samples with ferrous solution. Ferrous and ferric iron ions show significantly different relaxation behaviors in MRI but similar susceptibility patterns. These properties can be used to differentiate ferrous and ferric samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Physics and Astronomy 5 10%
Chemistry 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 22 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,666,779
of 23,555,482 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#272
of 1,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,005
of 310,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,555,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,427 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.