| Title |
Protégé: A Tool for Managing and Using Terminology in Radiology Applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-007-9065-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel L. Rubin, Natalya F. Noy, Mark A. Musen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 82 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 45 | 47% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,627,771
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#110
of 1,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,281
of 67,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,064 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.