↓ Skip to main content

Indirect costs account for half of the total costs of an osteoporotic fracture: a prospective evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Indirect costs account for half of the total costs of an osteoporotic fracture: a prospective evaluation
Published in
Osteoporosis International, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00198-013-2505-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. A. Eekman, M. M. ter Wee, V. M. H. Coupé, S. Erisek-Demirtas, M. H. Kramer, W. F. Lems

Abstract

Data on direct and indirect costs of clinical fractures in 116 osteoporotic patients 50 years and older were prospectively collected using cost diaries. Indirect costs accounted for roughly half of the total costs, with a contribution of at least 81% of these costs in employed patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 53%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,189,800
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,260
of 3,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,569
of 204,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#12
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.