↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic range of mass accuracy in LTQ orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
362 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
437 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic range of mass accuracy in LTQ orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, July 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.03.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Makarov, Eduard Denisov, Oliver Lange, Stevan Horning

Abstract

Using a novel orbitrap mass spectrometer, the authors investigate the dynamic range over which accurate masses can be determined (extent of mass accuracy) for short duration experiments typical for LC/MS. A linear ion trap is used to selectively fill an intermediate ion storage device (C-trap) with ions of interest, following which the ensemble of ions is injected into an orbitrap mass analyzer and analyzed using image current detection and fast Fourier transformation. Using this technique, it is possible to generate ion populations with intraspectrum intensity ranges up to 10(4). All measurements (including ion accumulation and image current detection) were performed in less than 1 s at a resolving power of 30,000. It was shown that 5-ppm mass accuracy of the orbitrap mass analyzer is reached with >95% probability at a dynamic range of more than 5000, which is at least an order of magnitude higher than typical values for time-of-flight instruments. Due to the high resolving power of the orbitrap, accurate mass of an ion could be determined when the signal was reliably distinguished from noise (S/Np-p)>2...3).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 412 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 122 28%
Researcher 84 19%
Student > Master 63 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 7%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 56 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 132 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 11%
Environmental Science 16 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 3%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 73 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,418,699
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#207
of 3,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,081
of 88,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,836 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.