↓ Skip to main content

Network modularity reveals critical scales for connectivity in ecology and evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Network modularity reveals critical scales for connectivity in ecology and evolution
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2013
DOI 10.1038/ncomms3572
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Fletcher, Andre Revell, Brian E. Reichert, Wiley M. Kitchens, Jeremy D. Dixon, James D. Austin

Abstract

For nearly a century, biologists have emphasized the profound importance of spatial scale for ecology, evolution and conservation. Nonetheless, objectively identifying critical scales has proven incredibly challenging. Here we extend new techniques from physics and social sciences that estimate modularity on networks to identify critical scales for movement and gene flow in animals. Using four species that vary widely in dispersal ability and include both mark-recapture and population genetic data, we identify significant modularity in three species, two of which cannot be explained by geographic distance alone. Importantly, the inclusion of modularity in connectivity and population viability assessments alters conclusions regarding patch importance to connectivity and suggests higher metapopulation viability than when ignoring this hidden spatial scale. We argue that network modularity reveals critical meso-scales that are probably common in populations, providing a powerful means of identifying fundamental scales for biology and for conservation strategies aimed at recovering imperilled species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Brazil 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 244 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 27%
Researcher 58 22%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 128 48%
Environmental Science 53 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Mathematics 6 2%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 51 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,383,096
of 24,452,594 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#31,762
of 52,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,529
of 214,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#192
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,452,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.