You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronic kidney disease and incident cancer risk: an individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, September 2025
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41416-025-03140-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie Harris, Hisatomi Arima, John Chalmers, Morgan Grams, Elvis Akwo, Jing He, Anita Lloyd, Natalia Alencar de Pinho, Marie Metzger, Bénédicte Stengel, Aghilès Hamroun, Ziad Massy, Panduranga Rao, Giselle Sosa, Vallabh Shah, Jesse Hsu, Alvaro Vigo, José Geraldo Mill, Paulo Lotufo, Scheine Canhada, Ben Schöttker, Hannah Stocker, Dietrich Rothenbacher, Markus P. Schneider, Anna Köttgen, Heike Meiselbach, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Jamie Green, Alexander R. Chang, Gurmukteshwar Singh, Emilie Lambourg, Shona Livingstone, Colin Palmer, Ewan Pearson, Sun Ha Jee, Heejin Kimm, Ronit Katz, Carina Flaherty, Jeff Mohl, Lyanne M. Kieneker, Stephan JL Bakker, Bert van der Vegt, Rudolf A. de Boer, Jaclyn Bergstrom, Joachim Ix, Keiichi Sumida, Prabin Shrestha, Ching-Yu Cheng, Tien Yin Wong, Pavitra Thyagarajan, William Herrington, Martin J. Landray, Colin Baigent, Philip Kalra, Darren Green, Smeeta Sinha, James Ritchie, Min-Kung Tsai, Jennifer Lees, Anders Larsson, Vilmantas Giedraitis, Andrew S. Levey, Dorothea Nitsch, Michael G. Shlipak |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2026.
All research outputs
#4,116,244
of 34,311,960 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#2,625
of 13,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,497
of 349,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#13
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,311,960 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.