↓ Skip to main content

Community engagement in biomedical research in an African setting: the Kintampo Health Research Centre experience

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Community engagement in biomedical research in an African setting: the Kintampo Health Research Centre experience
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwaku Poku Asante, Charlotte Tawiah Agyemang, Charles Zandoh, Jacob Saah, Lawrence Gyabaa Febir, Casimir Kabio Donlebo, Seth Owusu-Agyei

Abstract

Community engagement (CE) is becoming relevant in health research activities; however, models for CE in health research are limited in developing countries. The Kintampo Health Research Centre (KHRC) conducts research to influence health policy locally and also internationally. Since its establishment in 1994 with the mandate of conducting relevant public health studies in the middle part of Ghana, KHRC has embarked on a series of clinical and operational studies involving community members. In these studies, community members have been engaged through community durbars before, during and also after all study implementations. Lessons learnt from these activities suggested the need to embark on further CE processes that could serve as a model for emerging research institutions based in African communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sierra Leone 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Social Sciences 14 17%
Unspecified 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,349,805
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,446
of 7,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,596
of 207,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#105
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.