You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient-centered Applications: Use of Information Technology to Promote Disease Management and Wellness. A White Paper by the AMIA Knowledge in Motion Working Group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1197/jamia.m2492 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George Demiris, Lawrence B. Afrin, Stuart Speedie, Karen L. Courtney, Manu Sondhi, Vivian Vimarlund, Christian Lovis, William Goossen, Cecil Lynch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 333 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 16% |
| Researcher | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 22% |
| Unknown | 59 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 64 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 16% |
| Unknown | 80 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,926,308
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
#544
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,164
of 88,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them