| Title |
Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sacha Epskamp, Denny Borsboom, Eiko I. Fried |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 26% |
| Canada | 4 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Iceland | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 48% |
| Scientists | 11 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1392 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 254 | 18% |
| Researcher | 181 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 161 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 117 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 91 | 7% |
| Other | 201 | 14% |
| Unknown | 391 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 546 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 61 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 50 | 4% |
| Engineering | 27 | 2% |
| Other | 166 | 12% |
| Unknown | 471 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#990,481
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#72
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,913
of 326,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.