| Title |
Comparison of methane, nitrous oxide fluxes and CO2 respiration rates from a Mediterranean cork oak ecosystem and improved pasture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant and Soil, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11104-013-1923-6 |
| Authors |
Alla Shvaleva, Filipe Costa e Silva, Joaquim Miguel Costa, Alexandra Correia, Margaret Anderson, Raquel Lobo-do-Vale, David Fangueiro, Catarina Bicho, João Santos Pereira, Maria Manuela Chaves, Ute Skiba, Cristina Cruz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#2,059
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,478
of 213,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.