| Title |
The early bird gets the worm: foraging strategies of wild songbirds lead to the early discovery of food sources
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Letters, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0578 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#497,933
of 31,807,788 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#512
of 3,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,152
of 356,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#10
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,807,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.