↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Fecal Incontinence by International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI)

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai zasshi, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Fecal Incontinence by International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI)
Published in
Nihon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai zasshi, January 2015
DOI 10.3862/jcoloproctology.68.928
Authors

Toshiki Mimura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,338,984
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai zasshi
#8
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,494
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai zasshi
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.