↓ Skip to main content

Long‐distance dispersal maximizes evolutionary potential during rapid geographic range expansion

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Ecology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long‐distance dispersal maximizes evolutionary potential during rapid geographic range expansion
Published in
Molecular Ecology, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/mec.12538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cécile Berthouly‐Salazar, Cang Hui, Tim M. Blackburn, Coline Gaboriaud, Berndt J. van Rensburg, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren, Johannes J. Le Roux

Abstract

Conventional wisdom predicts that sequential founder events will cause genetic diversity to erode in species with expanding geographic ranges, limiting evolutionary potential at the range margin. Here, we show that invasive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in South Africa preserve genetic diversity during range expansion, possibly as a result of frequent long-distance dispersal events. We further show that unfavourable environmental conditions trigger enhanced dispersal, as indicated by signatures of selection detected across the expanding range. This brings genetic variation to the expansion front, counterbalancing the cumulative effects of sequential founding events and optimizing standing genetic diversity and thus evolutionary potential at range margins during spread. Therefore, dispersal strategies should be highlighted as key determinants of the ecological and evolutionary performances of species in novel environments and in response to global environmental change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 144 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 22%
Student > Master 19 12%
Professor 10 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 64%
Environmental Science 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Physics and Astronomy 6 4%
Mathematics 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 23 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2013.
All research outputs
#19,977,226
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Ecology
#6,052
of 6,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,446
of 221,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Ecology
#75
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.