↓ Skip to main content

Should Home-Based HIV Testing and Counseling Services be Offered Periodically in Programs of ARV Treatment as Prevention? A Case Study in Likoma (Malawi)

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Should Home-Based HIV Testing and Counseling Services be Offered Periodically in Programs of ARV Treatment as Prevention? A Case Study in Likoma (Malawi)
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10461-012-0365-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphane Helleringer, James Mkandawire, Georges Reniers, Linda Kalilani-Phiri, Hans-Peter Kohler

Abstract

To reduce HIV incidence, prevention programs centered on the use of antiretrovirals require scaling-up HIV testing and counseling (HTC). Home-based HTC services (HBHTC) increase HTC coverage, but HBHTC has only been evaluated during one-off campaigns. Two years after an initial HBHTC campaign ("round 1"), we conducted another HBHTC campaign ("round 2") in Likoma (Malawi). HBHTC participation increased during round 2 among women (from 74 to 83%, P < 0.01). New HBHTC clients were recruited, especially at ages 25 and older. Only 6.9% of women but 15.9% of men remained unreached by HBHTC after round 2. HIV prevalence during round 2 was low among clients who were HIV-negative during round 1 (0.7%), but high among women who received their first ever HIV test during round 2 (42.8%). The costs per newly diagnosed infection increased significantly during round 2. Periodically conducting HBHTC campaigns can further increase HTC, but supplementary interventions to enroll individuals not reached by HBHTC are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Master 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Social Sciences 17 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2013.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,535
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,633
of 280,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#39
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.