↓ Skip to main content

Improvements in access to malaria treatment in Tanzania following community, retail sector and health facility interventions -- a user perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improvements in access to malaria treatment in Tanzania following community, retail sector and health facility interventions -- a user perspective
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Alba, Angel Dillip, Manuel W Hetzel, Iddy Mayumana, Christopher Mshana, Ahmed Makemba, Mathew Alexander, Brigit Obrist, Alexander Schulze, Flora Kessy, Hassan Mshinda, Christian Lengeler

Abstract

The ACCESS programme aims at understanding and improving access to prompt and effective malaria treatment. Between 2004 and 2008 the programme implemented a social marketing campaign for improved treatment-seeking. To improve access to treatment in the private retail sector a new class of outlets known as accredited drug dispensing outlets (ADDO) was created in Tanzania in 2006. Tanzania changed its first-line treatment for malaria from sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) to artemether-lumefantrine (ALu) in 2007 and subsidized ALu was made available in both health facilities and ADDOs. The effect of these interventions on understanding and treatment of malaria was studied in rural Tanzania. The data also enabled an investigation of the determinants of access to treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 157 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Lecturer 11 7%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Social Sciences 24 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 41 25%