↓ Skip to main content

Lifecourse Health Development: Past, Present and Future

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
415 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
623 Mendeley
Title
Lifecourse Health Development: Past, Present and Future
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10995-013-1346-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neal Halfon, Kandyce Larson, Michael Lu, Ericka Tullis, Shirley Russ

Abstract

During the latter half of the twentieth century, an explosion of research elucidated a growing number of causes of disease and contributors to health. Biopsychosocial models that accounted for the wide range of factors influencing health began to replace outmoded and overly simplified biomedical models of disease causation. More recently, models of lifecourse health development (LCHD) have synthesized research from biological, behavioral and social science disciplines, defined health development as a dynamic process that begins before conception and continues throughout the lifespan, and paved the way for the creation of novel strategies aimed at optimization of individual and population health trajectories. As rapid advances in epigenetics and biological systems research continue to inform and refine LCHD models, our healthcare delivery system has struggled to keep pace, and the gulf between knowledge and practice has widened. This paper attempts to chart the evolution of the LCHD framework, and illustrate its potential to transform how the MCH system addresses social, psychological, biological, and genetic influences on health, eliminates health disparities, reduces chronic illness, and contains healthcare costs. The LCHD approach can serve to highlight the foundational importance of MCH, moving it from the margins of national debate to the forefront of healthcare reform efforts. The paper concludes with suggestions for innovations that could accelerate the translation of health development principles into MCH practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 623 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
India 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 609 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 109 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 15%
Researcher 85 14%
Student > Bachelor 48 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 7%
Other 117 19%
Unknown 132 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 18%
Social Sciences 102 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 80 13%
Psychology 50 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 4%
Other 74 12%
Unknown 184 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#919,683
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#66
of 2,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,604
of 214,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.