| Title |
Differential contributions of dopaminergic D1- and D2-like receptors to cognitive function in rhesus monkeys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-006-0347-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefani N. Von Huben, Sophia A. Davis, Christopher C. Lay, Simon N. Katner, Rebecca D. Crean, Michael A. Taffe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 29% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,411,380
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#4,949
of 5,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,311
of 67,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#43
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.