↓ Skip to main content

BRAF plus MEK-targeted drugs: a new standard of treatment for BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
BRAF plus MEK-targeted drugs: a new standard of treatment for BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10555-017-9660-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Queirolo, Francesco Spagnolo

Abstract

BRAF plus MEK-targeted drugs have out-performed BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in three randomized phase 3 studies, and such combinations have become a new standard of treatment for BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. With an overall response rate of about 70%, no other therapy in melanoma has shown a better response rate in late-phase clinical trials than combined BRAF and MEK inhibitors; the rapid kinetics of response make them the ideal front-line treatment for symptomatic, BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma patients. Nevertheless, the development of mechanisms of resistance limits the duration of response to such treatment in the majority of cases, with only about 20% of patients treated with the combination being progression-free at 3 years. The aim of this review is to report the efficacy and safety outcomes of the combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy and immunotherapy, as well as to discuss future perspectives to improve outcomes based on current clinical and translational research studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Other 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,009,265
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#260
of 811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,622
of 308,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.