Title |
Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00404-015-3680-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mathijs D. Blikkendaal, Evelyn M. Schepers, Erik W. van Zwet, Andries R. H. Twijnstra, Frank Willem Jansen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 50% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,690,774
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#270
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,122
of 262,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.