You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-Flow Nasal Cannulae in Very Preterm Infants after Extubation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1300071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brett J Manley, Louise S Owen, Lex W Doyle, Chad C Andersen, David W Cartwright, Margo A Pritchard, Susan M Donath, Peter G Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 27% |
| Australia | 3 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 23% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 297 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 13% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 88 | 28% |
| Unknown | 67 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 190 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 85 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,227,646
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#10,687
of 32,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,010
of 223,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#179
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.