↓ Skip to main content

Refill adherence and self‐reported adverse drug reactions and sub‐therapeutic effects: a population‐based study

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Refill adherence and self‐reported adverse drug reactions and sub‐therapeutic effects: a population‐based study
Published in
Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/pds.3528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khedidja Hedna, Staffan Hägg, Karolina Andersson Sundell, Max Petzold, Katja M. Hakkarainen

Abstract

To assess refill adherence to dispensed oral long-term medications among the adult population and to investigate whether the percentages of self-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and sub-therapeutic effects (STEs) differed for medications with adequate refill adherence, oversupply, and undersupply.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety
#1,682
of 2,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,167
of 223,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety
#25
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.