| Title |
Applying Human Factors to the Design of Medical Equipment: Patient-Controlled Analgesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, May 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1009928203196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Lin, Racquel Isla, Karine Doniz, Heather Harkness, Kim J. Vicente, D. John Doyle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 25 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 16% |
| Psychology | 16 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Design | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#278
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,692
of 33,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them